Legal Citations – Putting the Components of Case Citation Together
Here are the various components that may make up a case citation:
Style of Cause, (Year of Decision), | Neutral Citation | Core Citation | Parallel Citation |
Style of Cause, |
|
|
(Year of Decision), |
|
|
Neutral Citation | Year |
|
Tribunal Identifier |
|
|
Ordinal Number of the Decision, |
|
|
Core Citation |
[Year of Reporter] |
|
Volume Number |
|
|
Reporter |
|
|
(Series) |
|
|
Page |
|
|
Pinpoint |
|
|
Parallel Citation | [Year of Reporter] |
|
Volume Number |
|
|
Reporter |
|
|
(Series) |
|
|
Page |
|
|
(Court). |
|
NOTE: If there is no neutral citation, a second print reporter (or parallel) citation is required.
The following are some examples of case citations:
EXAMPLE 1: Neutral Citation Available
Neutral Citation | ||||
Style of Cause, | (Year of Decision), | Year | Tribunal ID | Ordinal #, |
Beals v Saldanha, | 2003 | SCC | 72, |
Core Citation |
|||||
[Year of Reporter] | Vol # | Reporter | (Series) | 1st Page | Pinpoint |
[2003] | 3 | SCR | 416 | at para 28, |
Parallel Citation | |||||
[Year of Reporter] | Vol # | Reporter | (Series) | 1st Page | (Court). |
234 | DLR | (4th) | 1. |
Beals v Saldanha, 2003 SCC 72, [2003] 3 SCR 416 at para 28, 234 DLR (4th) 1.
- The year of decision is not required in this case because the citation includes this information.
- The core citation tells you that this case is printed in an official reporter, the Supreme Court Reports (SCR). Notice how this reporter is organized by year and volume numbers. Also, note that since there is both a neutral citation (SCC) and a reporter title which infers the court level and jurisdiction (i.e. Supreme Court Reports tells us the case is from the Supreme Court of Canada), this information does not have to be listed at the end of the citation.
- The parallel citation provides an additional reporter where the case was printed. Notice how, unlike the SCR, the Dominion Law Reports (DLR) is organized by volume and series.
This example can be broken down into its components as follows:
EXAMPLE 2: No Neutral Citation
R v Morgentaler, [1988] 1 SCR 30, 44 DLR (4th) 385.
Neutral Citation | Core Citation | Parallel Citation | ||||
Style of Cause, | Year | [Year of Reporter] | [1988] | [Year of Reporter] | ||
(Year of Decision) | Tribunal ID | Vol# | 1 | Vol# | 44 | |
R v Morgentaler, | Ordinal #, | Reporter | SCR | Reporter | DLR | |
(Series) | (Series) | (4th) | ||||
1st Page | 30, | 1st Page | 385 | |||
Pinpoint | (Court). |
R v Morgentaler, [1988] 1 SCR 30, 44 DLR (4th) 385.
- This case is actually between the appellants Dr. Henry Morgentaler, Dr. Leslie Frank Smoling and Dr. Robert Scott; the respondent, Her Majesty the Queen; and the Attorney General of Canada as intervener. However, since this is a criminal case, the Queen is replaced by "R” for the purposes of the style of cause. Similarly, only the first named party should be included in the style of cause; thus, the style of cause of the case becomes "R v Morgentaler”.
- The official reporter (in this case, the SCR) is organized by year, so there is no need to indicate the year of the decision separately.
This example can be broken down into its components as follows:
EXAMPLE 3: Year of Decision Required
Thwaites v Ryan (1983), [1984] VR 65 (SC).
Neutral Citation | ||||
Style of Cause, | (Year of Decision), | Year | Tribunal ID | Ordinal #, |
Thwaites v Ryan | (1983), |
Core Citation | |||||
[Year of Reporter] | Vol # | Reporter | (Series) | 1st Page | Pinpoint |
[1984] | VR | 65 |
Parallel Citation | |||||
[Year of Reporter] | Vol # | Reporter | (Series) | 1st Page | (Court). |
(SC). |
Thwaites v Ryan (1983), [1984] VR 65 (SC).
- Although a parallel citation is always recommended, they are not always available; e.g. if a case has only ever been published in one reporter. In this case, it has only been published in one reporter and does not seem to be available online; therefore, there is no parallel citation.
- Because there is no neutral citation, and owing to the fact that the year of the reporter is different from the year of the decision, you must indicate the year of the decision directly after the style of cause.
- The core citation, in this case, is to the Victorian Reports (VR). If you consult APPENDIX C of the McGill Guide, you will notice that the VR is an Australian case law reporter; therefore, this is an Australian case.
- Moreover, because the level of the court is not inferable from the reporter title, you must indicate this information at the end of the core citation. The "SC” indicates that this case was heard at the "Supreme Court” level. Note that court hierarchy and names vary from country to country. For example, in Canada, the Supreme Court is the highest court in the country, whereas in Australia, the High Court of Australia is the highest court in the land, above its Supreme Courts.
This example can be broken down into its components as follows:
Thwaites v Ryan (1983), [1984] VR 65 (SC).