Daniel Morin
The strategic academic planning process launched by the University a year ago passed an important milestone in early January when the Senate approved the Vision 2010 corporate direction document.
Its main points are not much different from those contained in the working document issued last October, said Vice-President Academic and Provost, Robert Major, who is spearheading the project.
“It’s a very important commitment on the part of the Senate. This document will guide our decisions for the next five years. Upon reading Vision 2010, faculties and services are receiving mandates.”
Major saluted the many people who helped in crafting the document by taking part in the “largest consultation ever held at the University.” It involved more than 30 public meetings in faculties and services, as well as 12 roundtables that produced white papers on specific themes.
The next step in the process is for faculties and services to present their strategic plans by March 31. In developing their own plans, units will be guided by the policy directions and objectives outlined in the document approved by Senate.
“Once the plans from the faculties and services are submitted, discussed by the Committe on Academic Planning, and approved, we will have an integrated plan for the University of Ottawa,” Major said. The process is expected to be completed in the spring.
In highlighting the mission, vision and values of the University, the corporate direction document “upholds and reinforces” certain commitments that were previously taken, Major said.
“The number of major directions were reduced from four to three,” he added. These directions are:
There are eight objectives attached to these directions:
Under each of these objectives, the document outline a series of proposed actions by the University. The development and implementation of these actions in detail will be largely the responsibility of academic and administrative units in their own strategic plans.
Some of these proposals are rather specific in nature. For example:
Other proposals are more general. For example: